Metadata
Authors: Sylvia Carlisle ∙ Year: 2020 ∙ DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695238 ∙ URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1695238
Abstract
Specifications grading is a version of mastery grading distinguished by giving students clear specifications that their work must meet, and grading most things pass/fail based on those specifications. Mastery grading systems can get quite elaborate, with hierarchies of objectives and various systems for rewriting and retesting. In this article I present and discuss the results of two relatively simple implementations of specs grading, one in a differential equations course, and one in a discrete math course that includes an introduction to proof writing. I highlight several novel aspects of my systems: a buy-in activity, a “catch-up” quiz, and an oral quiz option.
Highlights
“The specifications say that worksheets must be turned in on time, neatly presented with relevant work and explanations of answers, and in general should reflect a good-faith effort to do all the problems correctly. Most minor errors are forgiven, and a fair number of major errors are allowed. This is because homework is for practice. Indeed, homework is a place to make these errors and get feedback to help fix them.” (Carlisle, 2020, p. 8)
“For example, if a student demonstrates most of the skills being tested, doing roughly B+ work overall, but is deficient in one type of question, I will often give a progressing and have them just rewrite that part of the quiz.” (Carlisle, 2020, p. 19)
Summary/Takeaways
- Isn’t this what teaching is supposed to be about?